Short URL:
  • Tutorials
  • Gear Reviews
  • Book Reviews
  • Challenges
  • Galleries
  • Forums
Digital Grin  > Reviews You Can Use > Lenses > Canon 24-105L Review
gallery pages:  1  

By Andy


My first look at Canon's 24-105L lens was at the Canon Expo in NYC in the Fall of 2005.  I watched  Douglas Kirkland and a bunch of Canon's Explorers of Light use this lens for real work.
It's always encouraging to see real working pros using the gear one is considering.  And yes, subsequently I interviewed Douglas, and he still uses it.  For me, it was an obvious choice, I just hoped that it would hold up to close scrutiny and my actual use.  My first outing with it was a portrait session.  The results are beautiful.  Excellent color rendition, beautiful sharpness, and lovely contrast.  This shot at 82mm.
By Andy

My first look at Canon's 24-105L lens was at the Canon Expo in NYC in the Fall of 2005. I watched Douglas Kirkland and a bunch of Canon's Explorers of Light use this lens for real work.

It's always encouraging to see real working pros using the gear one is considering. And yes, subsequently I interviewed Douglas, and he still uses it. For me, it was an obvious choice, I just hoped that it would hold up to close scrutiny and my actual use. My first outing with it was a portrait session. The results are beautiful. Excellent color rendition, beautiful sharpness, and lovely contrast. This shot at 82mm.
Shortly after I got the lens, Canon issued a recall on early production models of this new lens.  They talked about "unacceptable levels" of flare, on models with designation of UT999 or less.  Actually, it's rather interesting, isn't it?  I had one of the early models, and thought "why bother?"  But I've since sent it in to Canon (at their expense) and they gave me a new model to replace it.
Shortly after I got the lens, Canon issued a recall on early production models of this new lens. They talked about "unacceptable levels" of flare, on models with designation of UT999 or less. Actually, it's rather interesting, isn't it? I had one of the early models, and thought "why bother?" But I've since sent it in to Canon (at their expense) and they gave me a new model to replace it.
It's a really fun lens to just "take along."  I totally dig the focal lengths availalbe, and the low light performance is excellent.   Have a look at a sample 100% crop from this photo.
Maybe you like sports action?  Or just put it on your camera for a family event.  You won't be disappointed.
It's a really fun lens to just "take along." I totally dig the focal lengths availalbe, and the low light performance is excellent. Have a look at a sample 100% crop from this photo.

Maybe you like sports action? Or just put it on your camera for a family event. You won't be disappointed.
Many folks are comparing this lens to Canon's 24-70 f/2.8L.  They want the f/2.8 "for the bokeh wide open."  Well, here's just a test shot to demonstrate the bokeh this lens can produce.  This is a row of 8x10 photos on the wall.  ISO 1600, f/4, 1/40th second.  Take a look at the
Many folks are comparing this lens to Canon's 24-70 f/2.8L. They want the f/2.8 "for the bokeh wide open." Well, here's just a test shot to demonstrate the bokeh this lens can produce. This is a row of 8x10 photos on the wall. ISO 1600, f/4, 1/40th second. Take a look at the nice bokeh in this 100% crop. Damn good, if you ask me! I did not expect to see such nice bokeh at f/4 on this lens.
Just another demo of the Image Stabilization.  ISO 800, f/7.1, 1/6th second, handheld. There's a 100% crop here.  The crop is unsharpened - and remember, it's ISO 800 from a full-frame Canon 5D so it's huge.  One more, at 1/8th second.


This lens makes an excellent companion to Canon's 70-200L lenses, as part of a two-lens travel setup.
Just another demo of the Image Stabilization. ISO 800, f/7.1, 1/6th second, handheld. There's a 100% crop here. The crop is unsharpened - and remember, it's ISO 800 from a full-frame Canon 5D so it's huge. One more, at 1/8th second.

This lens makes an excellent companion to Canon's 70-200L lenses, as part of a two-lens travel setup.
I find this lens more than a very serviceable performer on portrait shoots.  It's not easy finding a zoom that gives you the focal lengths you want, and the quality you need - Canon delivered both on this lens.In summary, this lens has a place in my bag, alongside my prized primes.  Build quality is excellent.  The IS just works, period - and can save your bacon so that's a huge plus.  The focal range is very convenient.  It's  a great performer on full-frame, or 1.6x body.   The color, contrast, and sharpness are Canon-L quality.  At $1250 retail, it's not cheap - but I think it's worth it.  I recommend this lens!

EDIT: Just added a comparison shot, showing this lens and Canon's 35L side by side.


Discuss this Lens on Dgrin Forums.
I find this lens more than a very serviceable performer on portrait shoots. It's not easy finding a zoom that gives you the focal lengths you want, and the quality you need - Canon delivered both on this lens.

In summary, this lens has a place in my bag, alongside my prized primes. Build quality is excellent. The IS just works, period - and can save your bacon so that's a huge plus. The focal range is very convenient. It's a great performer on full-frame, or 1.6x body. The color, contrast, and sharpness are Canon-L quality. At $1250 retail, it's not cheap - but I think it's worth it. I recommend this lens!
EDIT: Just added a comparison shot, showing this lens and Canon's 35L side by side.

Discuss this Lens on Dgrin Forums.
gallery pages:  1  

Gallery Comments

| hide gallery comments |


Photo Website Hosting by SmugMug Pro · Login · Contact · Help · Portions © 2013 SmugMug, Inc.
Show FeedsAvailable Feeds
Comments | Info | Keywords

| hide gallery comments

New comment: Requires approval

Name: 
Email: 
Link: 


Rating: stars
To foil spammers, enter this code: copy this text in this box: Code unreadable?